|
On January 1, 2006, Medicare reintroduced a limit on the amount of coverage
available for beneficiaries receiving outpatient therapy services. Two
distinct caps were placed on therapy services: one for physical therapy and
speech-language pathology combined and the other for occupational therapy.
A beneficiary must first cover the deductible, and pay 20% coinsurance.
Medicare will then cover the remaining 80% up to the $1810
financial limitation in 2008.
To compensate somewhat for these
coverage limitations, Congress passed an "exceptions
process" in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA),
which was set to expire January 1, 2007 but was extended by
Congress. The exceptions process was recently re-extended through December
31, 2009 by the The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act
of 2008 (MIPPA).
Either a provider or
the beneficiary can submit a request for an exception.
Although both automatic exceptions, which
are automatically approved, and those
requiring manual approval by Medicare were authorized by the DRA,
as of January 1, 2007, the manual process
for exceptions ended, and all services
that require exceptions to caps will be processed using the
automatic exceptions process.
The
most important aspect for approval of an exception is the "medical necessity" of
the requested therapy. Any request for an exception to a therapy cap
requires that the therapy be "medically necessary" for the treatment of the
condition.
Automatic Exceptions
Automatic exceptions can cover:
-
Diagnoses and procedures that are directly related to the condition;
-
Any associated complexities that may negatively impact recovery from that
condition;
-
Particular evaluation services.
A list of condition codes that fall into the "automatically"
excepted category can be found at
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/downloads/R855CP.pdf. Diagnoses
and procedures that qualify as automatic exceptions do not require that any
particular piece of documentation be submitted to the Medicare contractor.
Rather, whatever documentation demonstrates the "medical necessity" of the
automatically excepted diagnosis must be provided. However, complete
documentation must be maintained in case the claim is reviewed.
Though not specifically stated by CMS, Complexities appear to be of two
varieties: (1) physical ailments that lead to complexities in treating the
targeted condition of the body, and (2) complications of management flow leading
to a potential delay in treatment.
Depending on the nature of the complexity, an exception should be approved
for any complexity affecting the beneficiary’s ability to recover from the
condition. Complexities due to physical ailments must also be connected to
a condition, especially if they are to qualify as an automatic exception.
However, some complexities will qualify as an automatic exception even if they
are connected to a condition that is not specifically listed in the ICD-9 list
of automatically excepted diagnoses. This can happen for an unrelated
condition that causes a complexity affecting the rate of recovery for the
originally diagnosed condition. For example, if the beneficiary is
experiencing a musculoskeletal problem that is not associated with the condition
receiving therapy (example given by CMS: a wrist injury that prevents the use of
a cane), but it does impact the ability for the patient to recover, then this
complexity can qualify as an automatic exception for any additional treatment
required.
"Complexities"
due to management flow issues can be excepted for a variety of CMS
provided reasons, such as if a beneficiary requires treatment within 30
treatment days of being discharged from a hospital or SNF, or if a beneficiary
needs to return to a pre-morbid living situation, or if a beneficiary is unable
to reach an outpatient hospital therapy service due to lack of access (thus
resulting in approval for treatment at a non-hospital based facility).
Additionally, if a beneficiary requires both physical therapy and speech therapy
simultaneously, then this particular type of complexity will be excepted once
this double treatment reaches the cap.
Evaluation services are also "automatically" excepted, but will
only be excepted once the cap is reached (this is known as a retroactive
exception). To be excepted from the therapy cap, the services must be one
of the following from the list of Outpatient Rehabilitation HCPCS Codes:
-
92506 (evaluation of speech);
-
92597 (oral speech device evaluation);
-
92607 (evaluation for prescription for
speech-generating AAC device);
-
92608 (each additional 30 minutes required
for evaluation);
-
92610-92611-92612-92614-92616 (swallow
evaluations);
-
96105 (assessment of aphasia);
-
97001 (physical therapy evaluation);
-
97002 (physical therapy re-evaluation);
-
97003 (occupational therapy evaluation);
-
97004
(occupational therapy re-evaluation).
Limitations
Only 15 additional days of treatment may be requested at any one time.
However, a plan justifying any additional treatment days, including any days
beyond the initial 15, must be submitted with the exceptions request.
Contractor’s Decision
Process
If the Medicare contractor does not make a decision on a manual exceptions
request within 10 days, the services are automatically considered "medically
necessary" and the requested therapy treatment is automatically approved.
It is important to note, however, that the CMS information on this 10 day window
for contractors to make a decision infers that the contractor does not need to
notify the beneficiary of a decision within those 10 days, so the beneficiary or
his/her provider may need to inquire after the window has closed to ascertain
the determination.
Permanent Exception
The therapy caps do not apply to therapy services rendered in an outpatient
hospital facility or in emergency rooms. Therefore, beneficiaries that
have reached their limit of Medicare coverage for therapy can be referred to an
outpatient hospital setting where the therapy cap does not apply.
This exception does not include therapy services at SNFs however.
Appeals
Because the therapy caps are statutorily based, they are difficult to appeal.
However, an appeal is not precluded, and appeals of therapy caps appear
to follow the standard Part B appeals process.
Developments
Representative Philip S. English (R-Pa.) introduced bill H.R. 916 (Medicare
Access to Rehabilitation Services Act) to repeal the caps. A similar bill
is in the Senate (S. 438). Both were introduced
in February 2005 and have not received any action since their introduction.
However, the publication "The Hill"
recently reported that the House bill currently has 251 co-sponsors, and the
Senate version has 44 co-sponsors, and appears to be gaining momentum.
Authorities
Authorities for
"Developments"
-
Jeffrey Young, Drive to repeal therapy caps
gains supporters, The Hill, June 6, 2006.
-
House members urge extension of therapy cap
exception, McKnight’s LTC, June 1, 2006.
|